Harris & Company | Employment
199
archive,category,category-employment,category-199,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,qode-theme-ver-13.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.4.5,vc_responsive
 

Employment

The recent decision of BP Refinery (Kwinana) Pty Ltd v Tracey [2020] FCAFC 89 (‘Full Federal Court Decision’) sheds considerable light on the circumstances in which an employee could be  lawfully terminated for breach of employer’s policies on matters that do not directly affect work performance, and also suggests an...

In Austal Ships Pty Ltd v Clay [2018] WASC 178, the Supreme Court of Western Australia granted an interim injunction to restrain a former employee of Austal, Mr Clay, from commencing employment with a competitor. Mr Clay had commenced employment at Austal in August 2014 as an...

The Federal Government has recognised employee share ownership as something that should be encouraged.  It has set a target to increase the percentage of employees receiving shares as a benefit from employment from 5.5% in 1999 to 11% in 2009. To encourage this increase it has...

Developers and purchasers who wish to rely on the long term or permanent enforceability of restrictive covenants should be aware of section 28 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) (“the Act”). Section 28 enables environmental planning instruments to override restrictive covenants where development...